Sex Toy Sales Now Completely Legal In Fifth Circuit

I first talked about this case back in February. See Texas “Obscene Device” Law Struck Down. The issue was that the Texas legislature enacted a broad prohibition on the “selling, giving, lending, distributing, or advertising” of “obscene devices.” The law defined “obscene device” as any device “designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs.” At that time, the law was just struck down as unconstitutional by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Recently, on October 29, 2008, attorneys for the State of Texas informed the Appeals Court by telephone that the State did not intend to seek a writ of certiorari in this cause. What that means is that the decision by a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on Feb. 12, which overturned Texas’ obscene device law, remains the law of the land, at least in the three states that form the Fifth Judicial Circuit: Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi.

The Fifth Circuit decision in Reliable Consultants relied heavily on the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, which said that the government had no business interfering with (or criminalizing) the private sexual affairs of citizens. As Judge Thomas Morrow Reavley wrote in the Reliable decision, “Because of Lawrence, the issue before us is whether the Texas statute impermissibly burdens the individual’s substantive due process right to engage in private intimate conduct of his or her choosing. Contrary to the district court’s conclusion, we hold that the Texas law burdens this constitutional right. An individual who wants to legally use a safe sexual device during private intimate moments alone or with another is unable to legally purchase a device in Texas, which heavily burdens a constitutional right.”

My close friends Lou Sirkin and Jennifer Kinsley were instrumental in the outcome of this case. Nice work!

Read the AVN article here.

Advertisements

2 responses to “Sex Toy Sales Now Completely Legal In Fifth Circuit

  • Kyle Hudson

    This seems kinda of a wierd subject for the courts to bother themselves with, but leave it to Texas to try and outlaw something like this. What right would any state think they have to regulate something as personal as our sex lives. Just because it doesn’t fit into certain peoples beliefs of what is right, they figure they should outlaw it. I would only guess that the religious right was instrumental in getting the law passed in the first place. Glad to see that a panel of judges could see the broad scope of things being outlawed to follow if they allowed this law to continue. Texas should definately make a law for all residents to remove that stick that is placed in their bums.

  • Bridget Beckett

    I have a friend the moved from Texas not too long ago and I couldn’t believe it when she told me sexual “objects” were banned. Her friend when selling condoms had to refer to them as “candle stick holders”. This is outrageous! I completely agree with the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, which said that the government had no business interfering with (or criminalizing) the private sexual affairs of citizens. What the heck does the government have to do with our sexual lives? I agree with the observation that Kyle made about this is a weird subject for the courts to concern themselves with. Just because it isn’t everyone’s belief doesn’t mean they should be able to control the sexual lives of others.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: